Running both without wasting either
The two tools approach the same drop-off from opposite ends. A funnel tells you which step loses people and how many, and nothing about why. A recording tells you exactly why one person struggled, and nothing about how many others did the same.
So let each do its half. Add the Tiny Funnel script tag, click through your own flow with the recorder on (landing page, pricing, signup, welcome), and read the bars. The biggest gap is the step worth your attention. Then go watch recordings of that step, fix what you see, and come back to the bar to find out whether the fix moved the number. That last part is the bit recordings cannot do on their own: five sessions can tell you what went wrong, but only a count can tell you whether it stopped.
The Contentsquare move, briefly
Checked 2026-08-10: hotjar.com redirects to contentsquare.com, because the two merged into one platform in 2025. Nothing about the tools went away. Heatmaps, replay, surveys and feedback all continue inside Contentsquare, the free plan grew to 200,000 sessions a month, and legacy Hotjar accounts are moving onto Contentsquare plans. If you arrived here from a search for a Hotjar alternative because of the move, the honest summary is that the product is alive and bigger than before. What changed is the platform around it, and platform is exactly the thing to weigh: more products in one interface answers more questions, and carries every one of them with it.
The short version
Hotjar watches, Tiny Funnel counts. Use the funnel to find the step, use recordings to see why, and use the bar to prove the fix. Together they cost $10 a month more than Hotjar alone.