a plausible alternative
for deeper funnels

Plausible got simple right. Tiny Funnel is just as simple, only obsessed with funnels. Who buys, where they came from, and whether visitors from one place buy more than visitors from another.

Plausible details checked 10 August 2026 • https://plausible.io

How deep the funnel goes

why did checkouts drop, and what did the people who left do instead?

Both tools are cookie-less and both can see the drop. The difference is how far in you can go.

Plausible
  1. 1 Open the dashboard and watch the goal conversion fall
  2. 2 Open the funnel and find the step the drop-off moved to
  3. 3 Switch to user journeys and explore the paths around that step
  4. 4 Filter by source and read the flows, in aggregate
  5. 🥱 You know the step and the paths. What any one visitor did is not in the product, by design.
Tiny Funnel
  1. 1 Log in, the funnel is already drawn and the drop is on the bar
  2. 2 Filter to the week and the source that changed
  3. 3 Open the journeys of visitors who stopped at that step
  4. 4 Read what each of them did instead, return visits included
  5. 💡 Five journeys usually make the answer obvious, because people fail in patterns.

built for answers, not data scientists

Tiny Funnel is obsessed with getting you answers as quickly as possible. The funnel is the page that loads when you log in, and any visitor's whole journey is one click away.

See your funnel from every angle

The main view is always your funnel. You choose which visitors and from when and where.

See a visitor's full journey

Where they came from, which campaign, every page they touched, and whether they bounced, came back later, or converted.

what each one does

Plausible against Tiny Funnel, on the things that decide it.

Capability Plausible Plausible Tiny Funnel Tiny Funnel
What the dashboard opens on Plausible The whole site on one page a non-specialist can read in a minute. Tiny Funnel One funnel: a bar per step, the drop-off between each pair, filters pinned above it.
Funnels Plausible On the Business plan. Two to eight steps built from pageview and custom event goals, run in sequential or strict order, with the drop-off shown per step. Tiny Funnel The whole product. Steps recorded by clicking through your own site, reorderable, and a step can be a page view, a click, a server event or a page state.
One visitor's journey Plausible User journeys explores paths in aggregate, up to twenty steps deep. There is no per-visitor view, which is a privacy position rather than an oversight. Tiny Funnel Open any visitor and read their whole path, return visits and the step where they stopped included.
A step with a condition on it Plausible A goal is a page you visited or a custom event your code fires, so matching what an element says means writing that event first. Tiny Funnel "Count Subscribed only when the element says subscribed" is a per-step condition, not a code change.
A step your backend confirms Plausible The events API records server-side events, and the visitor is matched by user agent and IP, so your backend forwards both. Tiny Funnel Post the event with your own user id, Bearer-authed per funnel, and it lands on the journey of the visitor who caused it.
Cookies Plausible None. Cookie-less, first-party, and the hosted version keeps data in the EU. Tiny Funnel None either. A random first-party id in localStorage, no fingerprinting, nothing shared with ad networks.
Pricing Plausible By monthly pageviews, from $9 a month for ten thousand of them, no free tier. Funnels and user journeys sit on the Business plan, from $19 a month. 30-day trial. Tiny Funnel $10 a month per active funnel, visitors unlimited. 7-day trial, no card, and pausing a funnel stops the bill.
Open source and self-hosting Plausible Open source and self-hostable, with the code public on GitHub. Tiny Funnel Hosted only. If self-hosting is the requirement, Plausible is the better answer.

which one is yours

Both answer real questions. They are not the same question.

Stay on Plausible if
  • You want the whole site on one page you can read in a minute
  • Aggregate-only is a feature to you, not a limitation
  • Self-hosting or open source is a requirement
  • Your questions are about traffic, not about one flow through it
  • You run a content site, and pageviews are the thing to count
Add Tiny Funnel if
  • The question you keep asking is about one flow through a handful of pages
  • You want to read what individual visitors did, not only the aggregate
  • A step needs to be a page state, or an event your backend confirms
  • Nobody here wants to write event code to define a funnel step
  • You sell software, a course or another virtual good
Plausible

what Plausible does better

  • Site-wide analytics on one page, readable by anyone in a minute
  • Open source and self-hostable, which we are not
  • A tiny script, so the performance cost rounds to nothing
  • Cheaper for a single low-traffic site, if you do not need the funnel features
  • A privacy reputation earned in public over years
  • Funnels and user journeys do exist, and for aggregate questions they are enough

How to run both

Leave Plausible exactly where it is. Add the Tiny Funnel script tag next to it, then open your own site in setup mode and click through the flow you care about: the landing page, the pricing page, the signup form, the welcome screen. That click-through is the funnel, and there is no event code to write and no goal to configure first.

Nothing about the two scripts conflicts. Both are cookie-less, both are first-party, and they are answering different questions, so keeping both is not a transition state. It is a reasonable place to stay.

The layer Plausible chose not to build

Plausible is deliberately aggregate. That is a considered privacy position and it suits a site dashboard well. It also means that when a number moves, the individual stories behind it are not in the product: user journeys will show you the paths visitors take in aggregate, and it stops there.

Tiny Funnel keeps that layer. Any visitor in the funnel can be opened and read end to end, return visits included, down to the step where they stopped.

The same layer is what lets a step mean more than a URL. A step can be a page state ("the element says subscribed"), a click, or an event your backend posts when the money actually moves, attached to the visitor who caused it. A visitor the script tag has never seen cannot be started by a server event, so the journey always begins in the browser, but it can end in your webhook handler.

The short version

Keep Plausible for the site. Add Tiny Funnel for the funnel: where each cohort of visitors comes from, how far they get, and which of them buy. Adding it costs $10 a month per funnel, and neither tool uses a cookie.

frequently asked questions

Does Plausible have funnels?

Yes. On the Business plan you build a funnel of two to eight steps out of pageview and custom event goals, run it sequential or strict, and read the drop-off per step. For an aggregate view of one sequence, it does the job. What it deliberately leaves out is the layer underneath, which is where Tiny Funnel lives. Per-visitor journeys, per-step conditions, and steps your backend confirms.

Can I run Plausible and Tiny Funnel at the same time?

Yes, and for a lot of teams that is the right answer. The two scripts do not interfere, both are cookie-less, and they answer different questions. Keep Plausible for how the site is doing, and point Tiny Funnel at the one flow you keep asking about.

Is Tiny Funnel more private than Plausible?

No, and we will not pretend otherwise. Both are cookie-less and first-party, with nothing shared with ad networks. Plausible is aggregate-only, open source and EU-hosted, and their reputation is earned. Tiny Funnel keeps per-visitor journeys, and a customer can tie journeys to their own user ids, which is exactly the depth Plausible chose not to build. Pick by the question you need answered.

Will the two tools show the same numbers?

Close, not identical. Both count without cookies, but they identify visitors differently: Plausible derives a visitor from user agent and IP, while Tiny Funnel stores a random first-party id in localStorage. And a Tiny Funnel step can carry a condition or a server event, so the funnel counts are answering a slightly different question than a goal count. Expect the shapes to agree and the digits to differ.

What does Tiny Funnel not do?

Site-wide analytics, top pages, aggregate path exploration, open source, self-hosting. If those are the job, Plausible is the better tool and we would rather say so here than have you find out after installing.

the bottom line

Two honest summaries, then the shortest way to decide.

Plausible Plausible

Plausible made one page of honest, cookie-less site analytics that anyone can read, and earned its reputation the slow way. If the question is how the site is doing, it answers that with less apparatus than anything else in the category, and nothing on this page is a reason to take it off.

Tiny Funnel Tiny Funnel

Tiny Funnel is what you add for funnel analytics. How people get to your site and which of them buy, how far and how often each visitor cohort gets down the funnel, and what any one of them actually did on the way. The same simplicity and the same cookie-less bargain, pointed at a deeper question.

I want the whole site on one page

Plausible Plausible

Open source or self-hosting is a requirement

Plausible Plausible

I want to see how far each visitor cohort gets, and the journeys behind them

Tiny Funnel Tiny Funnel

A step needs my backend, or an element's text, to confirm it

Tiny Funnel Tiny Funnel

I keep wondering what the people who left did instead

Tiny Funnel Tiny Funnel

Tiny price • Pay per funnel

No tiers. No "contact sales." Just $10 a funnel.

7 day free trial
$10 /mo
Charged per site/funnel
Unlimited visitors tracked
Full visitor-by-visitor journeys
First-party, no cookie banner
Invite up to 5 team members for free
Pause a funnel and it stops billing
Live in 2 minutes, cancel anytime
Start free 7 day trial
No card needed. No annual lock-in.